It is Better to Prevent DUI/DWI than to Deal with its Consequences. Drunk Driving Defenses

They say it is better to learn from the mistakes of others. But actually everyone learns from their own mistakes. It is commonly known fact, that it is prohibited to drive when you are drunk. Although a lot of people ignore the potential danger and drive after having consumed alcohol or other drugs.

If you are charged with drunk driving and you don’t agree with the accusation, there are still some ways out. Let’s talk about your possible defenses in this case. The most common drunk driving defenses are:

no

  • Improper stop – this is the mostly used argument, that claims that the officer had no reason to stop the traffic.
  • accuracy of Breathalyzer test – your attorney may question the validity of test results, claiming that the equipment is not accurate or the officer doesn’t have enough qualification in doing this test.
  • accuracy of Field Sobriety Test – this defense questions the propriety of Field Sobriety Test and whether the results of it are accurate.
  • insufficient evidence for arrest – sometimes the officers can arrest the driver based on their own observations if physical signs such as bloodshot eyes, that could be a sign of impairment. Your lawyer can question that, by claiming that those are “personal opinions”, they are subjective, and have nothing to do with DUI. Physical signs can have another ground, for example allergies.
  • not driving at the time – if you were not driving but just sitting in your parked car, it can’t be a reason for arrest, although some states allow an officer to arrest for drunk driving even without the act of driving intoxicated.
  • rising BAC – it is well known that alcohol need time to “rise” in your blood, because it is gradually “absorbed” into your blood. If there was a long delay between the stop and actual testing, you can claim that your BAC wasn’t over the limit by the time of stop.
  • blood test – sometimes drivers claim that the results of blood test were tampered
  • improper officer’s actions – you may have evidence or testimony of officer’s improper actions that violated your civil rights and falsification of DUI report.

Continue reading

Kermit Gosnell: Accusation Of Illegal Late-term Abortions

A recent Wall Street Journal article written by Peter Loftus and Louise Radnofsky entitled: “Abortion Doctor Convicted of Murder in Baby Deaths”, reports that a Philadelphia abortion doctor was declared to be guilty of first-degree murder in the deaths of three babies born alive.

The hot abortion debate was caused by a horrible case of 2009 when Kermit Gosnell, 72 years old, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the 2009 sedation-overdose death of a 41-year-old woman during an abortion procedure. Dr. Gosnell was found not guilty on a third-degree-murder charge in the woman’s death, and he was acquitted of first-degree murder of a fourth baby.

Dr. Gosnell can get the death penalty when the jury will return next week to reach its verdict on his case.

Opponents and supporters of abortion rights have seized on Dr. Gosnell’s case. Antiabortion activists, accusing Dr. Gosnell of the violence in terminating pregnancies, believe the issue of late-term abortions could influence Americans who support abortion rights. They believe there are at least some instances in which abortion should be illegal.

Other opinion accuses restrictive laws in Pennsylvania and many other states, where women with low-income have few possibilities to obtain quality care they need. That is why “inexpensive” Dr. Gosnell became so popular for poor and desperate women, despite his practice could be illegal, unethical and unsafe.

Continue reading